{
"count": 0,
"families": []
}{
"count": 0,
"families": []
}{
"count": 1,
"families": [
{
"publication_number": "US11078291B2",
"jurisdiction": "US",
"assignee": "Sotio Biotech",
"title": "Maytansinoid antibody-drug conjugates targeting CLDN18.2",
"target": "CLDN18.2",
"modality": "Antibody-drug conjugate",
"priority_date": "2017-06-15",
"expiry": "2038-06-15",
"legal_status": "GRANTED",
"claim_types": [
"composition"
],
"keywords": [
"CLDN18.2",
"ADC",
"maytansinoid",
"DM1",
"DM4",
"non-cleavable linker",
"composition of matter"
]
}
]
}{
"publication_number": "US11078291B2",
"title": "Maytansinoid antibody-drug conjugates targeting CLDN18.2",
"legal_status": "GRANTED",
"independent_claims": [
{
"claim_no": 1,
"claim_type": "composition",
"text": "An antibody-drug conjugate comprising an anti-CLDN18.2 antibody, a non-cleavable thioether linker, and a maytansinoid (DM1/DM4) payload."
}
]
}{
"count": 0,
"families": []
}{
"count": 0,
"families": []
}Based on the search conducted, the following significant findings have been made regarding the proposed anti-CLDN18.2 antibody-drug conjugate with MMAE (auristatin payload) and a protease-cleavable peptide linker:
The identified patent contains blocking claims relevant to your proposed product:
- The claim encompasses an antibody-drug conjugate that includes an anti-CLDN18.2 antibody and a maytansinoid payload. This could potentially block any similar ADC targeting CLDN18.2 that does not sufficiently differentiate from the claimed invention.
Linker Modification:
- Since the blocking claim specifies a "non-cleavable thioether linker", using a protease-cleavable peptide linker could serve as a distinction to navigate around the claim.
Payload Alteration:
- Rather than using a maytansinoid payload (DM1/DM4), alternative payloads like auristatins (MMAE) may provide a credible design-around, as long as the other components of the ADC (antibody and linker) are also modified sufficiently.
Antibody Variants:
- Development of a different anti-CLDN18.2 antibody or different antibody variants that target a unique epitope on the CLDN18.2 antigen could provide a route to differentiation.
Given the grant status and the composition claim related to anti-CLDN18.2 ADCs, there may be substantial limitations for the proposed MMAE payload ADC unless alternative designs are pursued. Careful consideration of the claim scope and strategic alterations can facilitate a pathway for action in this domain.
Based on the search conducted, the following significant findings have been made regarding the proposed anti-CLDN18.2 antibody-drug conjugate with MMAE (auristatin payload) and a protease-cleavable peptide linker:
The identified patent contains blocking claims relevant to your proposed product:
- The claim encompasses an antibody-drug conjugate that includes an anti-CLDN18.2 antibody and a maytansinoid payload. This could potentially block any similar ADC targeting CLDN18.2 that does not sufficiently differentiate from the claimed invention.
Linker Modification:
- Since the blocking claim specifies a "non-cleavable thioether linker", using a protease-cleavable peptide linker could serve as a distinction to navigate around the claim.
Payload Alteration:
- Rather than using a maytansinoid payload (DM1/DM4), alternative payloads like auristatins (MMAE) may provide a credible design-around, as long as the other components of the ADC (antibody and linker) are also modified sufficiently.
Antibody Variants:
- Development of a different anti-CLDN18.2 antibody or different antibody variants that target a unique epitope on the CLDN18.2 antigen could provide a route to differentiation.
Given the grant status and the composition claim related to anti-CLDN18.2 ADCs, there may be substantial limitations for the proposed MMAE payload ADC unless alternative designs are pursued. Careful consideration of the claim scope and strategic alterations can facilitate a pathway for action in this domain.
Heuristic reference over the curated corpus for target=CLDN18.2, modality=Antibody-drug conjugate. Families in scope: 6 ({'GRANTED': 3, 'PENDING': 2, 'EXPIRED': 1}). BLOCKING = granted composition-of-matter on the same target+modality and not expired; WATCH = pending or method-only; CLEARABLE = expired. This is illustrative reasoning over a teaching snapshot, NOT legal advice.
| Publication # | Assignee | Legal status | Expiry | Claim type(s) | FTO relevance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2019173420A1 | LaNova Medicines | GRANTED | 2039-03-08 | composition, method | BLOCKING (granted composition-of-matter) |
| CN114106192A | Keymed Biosciences | PENDING | 2040-09-30 | composition | WATCH (pending — claims not yet fixed) |
| US11078291B2 | Sotio Biotech | GRANTED | 2038-06-15 | composition | BLOCKING (granted composition-of-matter) |
| US9051370B2 | Ganymed Pharmaceuticals / Astellas | GRANTED | 2029-01-03 | composition, method | BLOCKING (granted composition-of-matter) |
| WO2016166122A1 | Astellas Pharma | PENDING | 2036-04-13 | method | WATCH (pending — claims not yet fixed) |
| CN103509118A | Ganymed Pharmaceuticals | EXPIRED | 2018-11-24 | composition | CLEARABLE (expired) |
| OVERALL FTO VERDICT (heuristic) | BLOCKED — 3 granted composition-of-matter family(ies) read on the proposed product; need a licence or a design-around. |